"ASCDC Members are
instantly plugged into and gain access to a network of the leading
defense attorneys in our community thus securing an invaluable advantage
in their practices, either as a solo practitioner or a member of a firm"
Robert A. Morgenstern
ASCDC President 2009
MEMBERSHIP IN THE ASSOCIATION of
Southern California Defense Counsel is open by invitation and approval of the Board of
Directors to all members in good standing with the State Bar of California in Southern
California. As set forth in the bylaws of the ASCDC, requirements for membership are as
follows:
- Shall be limited to lawyers who are in good standing with the State
Bar of California and whose practice substantially involves the
defense of civil and business matters, including the prosecution of
eminent domain proceedings. (House counsel for insurance companies,
corporation or public entities also are welcome to join ASCDC)
- One current member of the Association must sponsor you
by signing the designated place on your application.
Membership Fees
The membership fee for the first year is $125.00, payable
upon submission of the membership application. This amount will not be pro-rated.
Membership fees are $230.00 per year after the first year. Click on the link below to
complete the membership application online. Or, to request a membership application by
U.S. Postal Mail, click here or call ASCDC at
213-683-1230.
Membership Application |
|
ASCDC News |
A March 10 airing of the KCRW program hosted by Warren Olney features Los Angeles Superior Court Presiding Judge Tim McCoy, who discusses the court's financial crisis and the need to begin staff layoffs this month. Judge McCoy is joined by Los Angeles County Bar president Don Mike Anthony, who explores the possible diversion of courthouse construction funds.
The interview can be accessed at this link, and begins approximately 28.5 minutes into the broadcast (you can move the time bar forward with your cursor).
Here is KCRW's description of the interview: "Los Angeles County judges are at
war with their counterparts in other parts of the state over
a pot of money. We hear what the outcome could mean for
family law, juvenile justice and public safety in
courthouses that are falling apart." |
|
|
|
|